What’s the difference between Interim and Fractional Management?

In the ever-changing landscape of modern business, companies often require specialised expertise to navigate challenges, implement changes, or drive growth initiatives. Interim management and fractional management are two strategies that businesses employ to access temporary executive or managerial talent. While they share similarities, understanding their differences is crucial for selecting the most suitable approach for specific organisational needs.

David Hazeldine, Director of Interim Management, explains the key differences between these two strategies.

Interim management involves hiring temporary executives or managers (typically, to fill vacant roles or lead specific projects) for a defined period. These interim managers possess significant industry experience and are brought in to maintain continuity, stabilise operations, or facilitate transitions such as mergers, acquisitions, or leadership changes. Interim managers are usually employed full-time for the duration of their assignment and can be responsible for day-to-day decision-making and strategic direction within their scope of responsibilities.

On the other hand, fractional management, also known as fractional leadership or fractional executive management, involves engaging part-time executives, managers, or specialists to undertake specific roles or provide expertise on a flexible basis. Fractional managers work remotely or on-site for a limited number of hours per week, offering their specialised skills in areas such as executive leadership, marketing, finance, operations, or technology. Unlike interim managers, fractional managers do not typically assume full-time responsibilities or have direct authority over organisational decisions. Instead, they collaborate with existing leadership teams to provide strategic guidance and support in targeted areas.

One key distinction between interim management and fractional management lies in the duration and scope of engagement. Interim management assignments are often temporary, spanning several months to a few years, and are focused on addressing immediate organisational needs or filling leadership gaps. In contrast, fractional management arrangements are more flexible and can be ongoing, allowing companies to access specialised expertise on an as-needed basis without committing to a long-term hire.

Additionally, the level of involvement and authority differ between interim managers and fractional managers. Interim managers typically assume full responsibility for the roles they fill, making decisions and driving initiatives independently during their tenure. In contrast, fractional managers serve as advisors or consultants, collaborating with existing leadership teams to provide strategic insights and support in specific areas while deferring to internal decision-makers for final authority.

Ultimately, while both interim management and fractional management offer valuable solutions for accessing temporary executive or managerial talent, they differ in duration, scope, level of involvement, and authority. Understanding these distinctions is essential to leverage external expertise effectively and meet their strategic objectives in a dynamic business environment.

Contact us to discuss how we can support with your interim hiring needs.

Sign-up for job alerts.

By entering your email you agree to receive job alerts and marketing communications from Procurement Heads. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. See Privacy Policy.

Scroll to Top